Pornography is WARFARE

Anyone that hasn't realized that Sex happens in the BRAIN

and our bodies are just virtual "PODS" that act as "sensor

terminals" for the Body-Computer, lacks Introspection and

is in need of some refinement. In India -due to poverty and

lack of food-, plump women proudly exhibiting their 'rolls'

were considered desirable, a proof of their purchasing power.

Thus "sex attraction" is but a complex neural web of implicit

meanings, where... sex... is not really sex. It is mostly the

prime carrier of EGO linguistics; the bigger your addiction to

Ego, the more riddled with "Win" meanings Sex will become.

So Sex starts as a way of calling ATTENTION to yourself, and

some push this to pathological levels. But pretty soon it will

end up being a powerful and addictive "Way of Proving you're

a Winner". Most women are still locked in the Jungle-Program

of seeking the "Best-Genes" for the offspring, which of course

is a certifiable way of BEATING THE COMPETITION. In the

Law of the Jungle, Ego equals Survival; "competition" is then

just their natural way of expressing this instict of preserving the

species. However when Survival isn't real anymore -as in our

present modern life-, still absurdly acting out this quest for the

best genes -as sheer Competition-, is a signal that a large

segment of the female population hasn't really evolved beyond

the appearances. A big jaw, strong shiny white teeth, a reduced

forehead, wide shoulders, muscular buttocks, tall complexion,

etc., are simply physical attributes that "MEAN" their man

has the best genes for the survival of their offspring, thus being

excited by this brute, makes these women a "Winner" in their

Brain-Linguistics of the jungle. Naturally modern translations of

these attributes have long-time kicked in, as in big bank account,

big shiny car, big house, fame, et al. You'll notice I haven't

mentioned the size of the Penis, underpinning of all of the above.

Some women rationalize the obsession with all of the above

-epitomized in a ridiculously large Penis-, by thinking that it is

the penis size what determines their sex intercourse pleasure;

this is patently false, has 100% to do with "Fantasy Excitement".

Women will say things like: "only a really large penis can truly

rub my G-spot at the same time it rubs my clitoris, providing

me with a double Clitoris/Vagina orgasm". But these imaginary

rationales are plain hubris, to cover up the fact that they lack

in the fantasy/imagination department, and they are actually

more attached to brute jungle survival linguistics, than males.

And the more females try to cover up this fact, the more it

becomes self-evident. Candles, oils, music, staging, etc., are

just cover-ups; the bottom line is, they STILL pick as "ideal"

mate the above brute type, and all the softening-image does,

is provide a better 'idea' of themselves. Another example

of this cover-up, is the unusual tendency of women to pick a

partner that resembles a famous actor; in their minds they

"think" this means the guy will have the psychological "deep"

qualities of the screen character, but in reality, they are just

sub-consciously picking a WINNER (picking a famous actor

means beating the competition). By and large therefore, of the

2 genders, women are the least conscious of the underbelly

of their Sexual-Instinct, they tend to "think" the very opposite

of what they are truly choosing, because this gives them a

better image-idea of themselves, as refined & evolved. This

sham of thinking oneself to be more advanced, even becomes

a fad amongst women, as Lesbianism just provide themselves

another form of "validation". Total nonsense; a heck of a lot

of false-lesbians (fad lesbians), are just terminally addicted

Ego-Trippers, acting a thinly disguised Men-Hate to "mean"

they are more evolved, delusionally so. The truth is of course,

that what they should really hate, is THEIR OWN PAST

patterns, of always picking the brutest males, as part of

their still active jungle mental program. A lot of women get

to realize this somehow, usually in the 50's and 60's, way past

their prime and practically into their geriatric years, so it is

a useless realization; 'too little - too late'.

Enter males. Most brute males are still locked in the WARRIOR

template. It's all about their penises, as symbol of their brute

dominance. Sophisticated classical cultures -as in Greece- thus

revered the opposite, small uncircumsized virginal penises, and

proudly exhibited them in naked statues placed conspicuously.

Large penises in that culture were considered low-class and a

proof of your low intellect, and intellect meant most in classical

greek culture. The Philosopher was The-Man, and philosopher

meant the opposite of an Ego-Tripper. However, greeks really

did enjoy the carnal pleasures, particularly sex, nevertheless

did it under the Fantasy/Imagination template of the mind.

Life was quite good in ancient Greece, thus "survival" wasn't

an obsession, civilization had tempered the requirements of

a harsh reality, through Thought and Science. The ideal sexual

partner then, was a refined soft imaginative type of male, a

philosopher, a poet, a thinker, a transcending individual. The

triumph over survival was evident in their penchant for anal

intercourse, sex was not linked to procreation/survival, and

also this type of sex required both extreme Higiene & Health,

another proud peak achievement of that civilization. So see,

"sex" always means something else; thus some greek males

took boys as their partners, signifying sex as an activity of

the mind, not linked to the procreation/survival mode. In

their heads this was not pedophilia, but a show-off of their

triumph over the law of the jungle patterns. Sex as just sheer

distraction, not attached to the "Win" ego attitudes; and sexual

excitement as derived strictly out of fantasy/imagination, not

out of Competition. It is impossible for me to relate to their sex

penchants -the boy thing is beyond me!?-, but I definitely find

their CONCEPT to be quite evolved.

The obsession with abnormally large penises in our present

days, is in this context a clear sign of Devolution. In fact, it

is clear that has transpired in males genetically growing larger

and larger penises. Compared to all previously advanced cultures

everywhere on Earth, be them the greek classical times, the

ancient indo-european arians, the tibetans, the ancient chinese,

the "native" remnants of the Atlantean civilization, etc., the

'desirable' penis size of modern occidental culture, is way larger,

unusually so. Its only match can be found in some African tribes.

If our modern culture of the West comes directly from ancient

Greece (and even the Roman Empire maintained this anti-big

penis attitude even all the way up to the Rennaissance times),

then one must ask about this patent incongruence. Our entire

system of Law and our entire Politics and out entire Science and

Philosophy and Art, comes directly from Greece, sometimes

even literally so (as in the "Republic", or "Democracy", etc.),

then one must properly ask the inevitable: how come then, in

this particular penchant for growing larger-than-life penises,

we differ so much from this cultural tradition...? Way past

the Rennaissance, it was still considered a sign of aristocracy

and well-being, to sport modest penises. When did this change

so dramatically...? The answer is: in the 20th century. This

reversal can be found starting with Prince Albert, the husband

of Queen Victoria. This Queen was a Freudian text-case; while

she married a guy with an exceedingly large penis (his taylor

had to make wonders to hide it) and peculiar sex obsessions,

she developed the "Victorian" sexual repression dogmatics.

But much earlier than that, King James I (yes, the one who

commisioned the english translation of the Bible), was a clear

case of a extremely debauched character, a homosexual who

loved orgies and had intercourse with his young lovers right

in front of people, often abruptly and out of context. We find

similar debauched attitudes in the French monarchies, we

all know that. Thus clearly it was the European Monarchies

after the Rennaisance, that began this sexual devolution into

either more debauched, or more brutish sex. Until we get

to the famous Jack the Ripper times, when the british monarchy

and aristocracy were suspect of being involved in highly

perverse sado-masochistic games (and the son of Prince Abert,

Allbert Victor Duke of Clarence, rumour has it was the leading

figure behind the Ripper cult murders). Then of course we have

the famous "Prince Albert piercing" of the penis, etc.

And we all know how perverse pedophilia -the abusive and

highly traumatic kind- made a monumental comeback in the

20th century, practiced widely by the world's elites in secret.

Even most religious institutions (no, not "just" the catholics...),

were used as disguised fronts for these activities, thus the

logic of the uncomfortable mixing of Education and Religious

orders of all kinds and camps. This revival of pre-classical

greek times of Perverse Sex focused on abuse and a penchant

for abormaly large penises, explains most of what followed. In

pre-classical times, a lot of humanity was involved to the hilt

in massive child sexual traumatic abuse and even child ritual

human sacrifice; this is what is called "The Old Time Religion"

as its core. This is the BACKGROUND GENETIC MEMORY

behind all brute-sex patterns. Satanic elites know this, and they

have deliberatley played this genetic memory card, reviving

both the WARRIOR and the ABUSER, into the 20th century

orgy of giant wars and systematic pornographic industry.

Pornography of course was but an expected Reaction to the

completely unnatural ways set by the Victorian Era, thus

one must also suspect a quite deliberate agenda towards this

expected reaction, on the part of the Queen Victoria elite.

Setting up one extreme to then naturally bounce back to the

other extreme, is Modus-Operandi de rigeur by the elites.

They have systematicaly done such a zillion times. But one

must then realize that the obsession with abnormally large

penises and brutish abussive type of sex, is a TRIGGER of

Extant Genetic Memory of the Human Race; by re-awakening

the brute abuser, they are also awakening the Warrior, because

both are one and the same. In this way, obsessions with larger

and larger penises and brute sex, goes hand in hand with the

mindset behind War and Conquest. Comedian George Carlin

exempified this in his observation of the Neuro-Linguistics

behind the war "totemic" apparatus: missiles and cannons

resemble penises, and Carlin went on to suggest war is but

nothing more than a psycho-sexual extrapolation of "My-Penis-

Is-Larger-Than-Yours". Quite sickly (and laughably) so.

Then society is caught in a sham game of "Peace vs. War",

where the result is rigged. Just like another induced polarity

of "Puritanism vs. Pornography" plays also as a perfect rigged

game; pornography always wins, and Puritanism merely raises

its value, it simply INCREASES THE EXCITEMENT implicit

in pornograhy. We have all been setup to need pornography as

a predictable release from the Victorian Era of rigidly imposed

unnatural and impossble to sustain repression of things sexual.

In this way, the opposite effect of desiring extremely large

penises and to wage permanent Wars of Conquest all over again

as a "normal" state of things, were inextricably tied up. The same

rigged extreme setup was imposed over Germany for instance,

when after WWI impossible-to-meet payment conditions were

setup for the loser germans, and this in turn predictably led to

massive poverty and unsustainable economic strife, out of

which "Hitler" was created (which some rumours say was none

other than the supposedly "dead in 1891" Prince Albert Victor).

Pornography in this context, is an act of Imperial dominance. It

is ot only allowed, but paid-for and promoted from very high,

because it psycho-sexually establishes a typical "Win" image of

"My-Penis-Is-Always-Larger-Than-You". Neuro-Linguistics

of Conquest, applied from the sexual point of view. So showing

off exceedingly large penises and brute sex, is a way of saying

to others, that we "win" and "dominate" the competition.