Friday, September 25, 2009

Is the Bible not about events that happened, but that WILL happen...? (in encoded symbols)

If anyone is under the impression I am "too" critical of our own
western Christian tradition -and unfairly so-, while being silent
on other religious traditions, let me dispel such by recommending
the following link. At no point I deem other cults to be better than
ours, quite the contrary for the most part, in fact. I only do feel
knowledgeable enough about our religion(s), to write with some
level of of authority on the subject, that's all. I don't have sufficient
detailed knowledge on the rest, to feel comfortable writing about
those subjects, it is that simple (on the other hand, I am quite
versatile on the Bible subject -particularly so on the Book of Rev.-
and Christian theology in general, to the level of PhD if one is to
"rate" my knowledge in the topic). Please do read the following:
-Now, you may proceed to my article, Part 1:-
The Bible is composed of parts; Part A is the Old Testament, jewish
in faith, Part B is the New Testament, christian in faith. We do know
for a fact that the jewish faith is divided between a Public religion
and a more secretive occultic esoteric body generally considered
& labeled as "Kabbalah" -consisting of several methods & layers of
ENCRYPTION of the texts-, which is very close to "magic", or is
magic itself nonetheless, both in its nature & practice (as divided
into Speculative Kabbalah and Practical Kabbalah, or divided into
Written Kabbalah and Oral Kabbalah, or the like).

Not wishing here to delve into the Kabbalistic conundrums, we can
although assert without any vagueness or confusion, that decent
rabbis (the 'very' knowledgeable kind) do know that the texts of
the Old Testament/Torah etc, IN FACT HAVE 3 OR 4 LAYERS OF
MEANING to be apprehended; the 1st. layer or onion-peel is the
cover story or LITERAL TEXT, but decent rabbis know that this
is not the definite or true meaning. The further layers of meaning
are encoded in the form of the many methods of Kabbalah, such as
the well-known Notarikon/Temurah/Gematria encryption methods,
or the-road-less-traveled "Computer Codes" and metaphorical or
allegorical methods.

In recent years, quite proficient and serious researchers have
questioned the nature of the judeo-christian religions, portraying
them as "Zodiac/Solar/Moon" cults utilizing the cover of literal
Bible texts and the trappings of dogmatic religion, to advance a
deeper secretive knowledge of Archeo-Astronomical connotation.
They contend that most religions (not simply the judeo-christian
cults), indeed do the same, and most often than not there are even
strikingly clear similarities in their cover literal stories.

One does not need a PhD in Harvard or possess the acute powers
of observation of a criminologist, to notice the similarities; Islam
is supposed to be "oh so" different from Christianity, yet besides
obvious Abrahamic identical roots, there is the in-your-face fact
that christianity took a decidedly islamic form of worship, AFTER
the islamic medieval incursions into the european territories. It
is obvious that christianity before that, had much less emphasis
on the Church & Tower & Bell, less of the female veil/robe (if at
all, or the male priest robe), less emphasis on strict & obsessive
and repetitive "scheduled in the day" prayer, etc. Without a doubt
these features were INCLUDED IN the christian religion, after
they had been "proven as effective" in the islamic religion. One can
say in confidence, that the Catholic Church was "Islamicized" to a
great extent in its forms of worship after the Medieval period,
as a direct -albeit secret- merging with the islamic religions.
In previous posts, I have shown how even the names of supposed
"enemy" religions such as ISLAM & ISRAEL cults, share 4 letters!
(or how the key Circumcision -"Brit MYLAH" in jewish religion/
language-, also share 4 letters with ISLAM).

We have to remember, that the Knight Templars were caught
in secret meetings with the Fatima cultists (the enemy) during
some of the Crusades; the aristocrats who discovered this, did
not take it well, and this must be clearly factored in as a dominant
underlying reason for their later dissolution. Is it more than just
curious, that precisely this name -Fatima- much later in the
early 20th. century became an icon of Virgin Mary worship (or
is it Fatima worship)...?. Fatima always was 100% muslim, and
iconically so; this name merger itself tells a lot. Of course the area
of Spain/Portugal (thus Fatima, Portugal) is where the biggest
islamic influence was felt, even to the point of arab-european
genetic mix. A topic to seriously ponder and research.

In what pertains to the topic at hand and beyond these 'mergers'
of worship, what is irrefutable, is that one can and indeed MUST
effect a process of DECODING OF THE NEW TESTAMENT, in
order to apprehend its inner secret meanings. Not only because
of its predecessor the Old Testament (as to Kabbalah), but also
because the entire New Testament was a product of earlier and
secret GREEK GEMATRIA -a form of advanced greek mysteries
type of Kabbalah, in greek, and using GEOMETRY in conjunction
with LANGUAGE, to convey advanced encoded meaning-.

In other words -just like in hebrew/egyptian Kabbalah-, the Greek
Gematria roots of the New Testament are all over the place, & they
also imply that the literal texts are mere cover stories for a much
deeper and convoluted cosmic saga, encrypted with great precision.

What belies the entire theme, is the suppressed fact that in the far
past and way beyond accepted official history, there existed on Earth
(and Earth then belonging to inter-planetary or even inter-stellar
"exopolitic" civilizations), much more advanced civilizations than
our present one. These collapsed due to cataclysmic events, and as
some left the planet, most perished, while others ended up isolated
and deprived of their former technological wizardry (in places like
Egypt, Cuzco, Yucatan, Easter Island, etc etc etc); these scattered
groups as survivors went into "anonymity" so to speak, as the next
millennia unfolded they creeped into power via the back door.

At heart in this highly complex saga, are what are better known as
"The Atlantean Priesthood", scattered groups of former Wizards
of very high sciences, a mixture of technology & psychic knowledge,
much ahead of our present level -unfortunately most of them of
a Dark-Slant, "black-magicians", in short-. These are the kind that
mostly stayed behind in the planet, and it is in them, that we find
all the clues and threads that lead to our very day, be it in the form
of Science/Technology, Religion, or Secret Lodge lore, all the same.

Their object has been to restore their former civilization, engaging
in a process of subjugation of the rest of earthly inhabitants. What
they possessed of utmost importance, is the knowledge of cosmic
templates of cyclic nature, events that repeat through eons of time.
It is quite apparent -once you realize what has truly been going on-
& SUCH, to be transmitted along generations.

However there is much more than meets the eye to all this, also
quite apparent that their inherent Dark-Slant favors a form of half
way truths as their usual routine, in order to hide relevant facts,
that would enlighten human beings as to what is the "Full" content
of what lies ahead -and not just a part of it, as they lay it out-. In
this aspect we will delve in later, having to do with the prevalent
to all eras & cultures concept of "Human Sacrifice", disguised in
multiple forms of worship, their main object to extract CONSENT
out of people, for these Mass Sacrifices -via deceitful "belief"-, in
the shape of ever increasing in scope & number, wars, diseases,
famines, cataclysms, etc. -as the timetable to the "2012 Theme Crux"
approaches. These very small secret dark elites have been utilizing
unethically to their advantage a key notion notion of "Transference
of Psionic Energy", what is suffering & death to some is "Harvested"
by another in etheric terms, as they are indeed descendants of inter
stellar Etheric Vampires; to them Earth merely a Kundalini factory
for the purposes of psionic energy harvesting. Thus they've engaged
in fabricating contrived dramas/intrigue/lies/tragedies, to this end.

But most of all they've hoarded only for them and concealed to you
any hint of relevant knowledge that leads to this higher wisdom; to
you, they strictly give out "5 Senses" science, "Literal Bible" dogma,
"Bi-Polar Ideology" (Divide-And-Conquer), "Deluded Racism" (both
in pro & reverse forms), they only teach you a tiny portion of very
late history (just the previous 4 thousand years, what a joke!?), &
essentially indoctrinate you to "think" & process information in just
a Linear-Sequential manner, mostly in gross material terms of the
3D kind, devoid of any hint of a really all encompassing "Big Picture"
be it in cosmic terms or in psychological terms. They have been
teaching you to be a robot, to be content inside a prison -the planet-,
and accept any "definition of reality" they propose you as "true", and
you have been accepting it all gladly, because they've bought you
with gadgets and honors or money -or what have you-. Your ideas
about your very "own identity" have been molded and shaped by
them -if not dictated to a tee-, you've taken as "yours" their toys
of blatant mind manipulation such as ideology, religion, class, etc.

Of course they are not alone in this planet, and there are other beings
here, some are positive and well intentioned; you can recognize them
when you are given higher knowledge and expanding information, the
kind that you never fathomed before. Not everything is bad around
here, all along these agendas, there continuously takes place a fine
process of Ascension in every thing and every single moment -even
in a thing as small as just a humble song-.

But whenever you are led to think that just by believing in something
you all of a sudden become 'so special', you must smell the rat; women
these days are indoctrinated to believe in their Mother-Goddess inner
divine, without any real introspection or self-critique whatsoever.
The former Patriarchal "God" is being replaced by and even older but
forgotten Matriarchal "Goddess", as that one was gradually exposed
as hoax, or as a manipulation/distortion of the divine. Meantime, the
real divine, the real & true Infinite Consciousness higher self, is not
given a play in the script; strictly limited & bipolar "selves" are thus
promoted, full of revenge & resentment underpinnings. What should
be an Ascension is boycotted into a fake psychotic delusional rant, an
obsession with restitution, entitlements, & ultimately psychic power.
Enlightenment becomes... "Entanglement".

This subtle process of "Entanglement", is the essence of the problem;
it is like this, by design; you have been trans-generationally given
"Labyrinth-like" alternatives, that lead ultimately to Bi-Polar states.
The greeks had it right, the Labyrinth is the mental state of humans.
The obfuscation is augmented as you are not told how sophisticated
the ancient greeks actually were; this concealment prevents you from
realizing for example, that the New Testament IS GREEK...! Not just
written entirely in greek, but greek in content, greek in style, greek
in the Gematria encrypted hidden meanings, greek in everything. The
"Chrystos" was a greek concept; the kind of knowledge that was put
into fables & figures in the New Testament, is a Syncretism of many
sources, but specially the EGYPTIAN MYSTERIES, combined with
a then "State-Of-The-Art" new science of SPIRITUAL GEOMETRY.

Yes I know, not the kind they taught you in school & college, there is
more of Pythagoras in the New Testament, than you ever imagined;
how could you? You were never told of Pythagoras for who he really
was and what he really taught; for that, you must become a member
of some very elite masonic lodges. However this Spiritual Geometry
incorporating Words & Numbers (as in Numerology), was ultimately
just a tool for the bottom-line wisdom, COSMIC GEOMETRY. This
the level of meaning that contains the "message" for generations
encoded in the "Bible" -as in many other carriers-, a message so
loaded with Archaeo-Astronomical prophecies, it is quite the riddle.
So if you despise stinky memberships to shadowy circles, you are
most welcome here, where you will find it all anyway, just reading,
without being peer-pressured into suspicious eerie rituals & such
spooky paraphernalia.

Pythagoras "Invented" (i.e. revived the lost art of) Music, he came
up once again with the Musical Scale, as Music of the Spheres; he
possessed the secret key, that this material Earth is part of a fractal
holographic universe; the structural order of one thing, is the same
structural order of everything else. The truth is that when Egypt
began to wane, knowledge was transferred to Greece (via Minos
at first); before the burning of the Alexandria Complex of Learning
in Egypt (not simply a "Library", it was a symposium centre, all the
learned in mysteries would go there and be educated in such). This
is how one can very easily trace both the origins of the Hebrew &
Greek alphabets out of the Phoenician Script (the link between the
Egyptian hieroglyphs and them), which is the same as to say that
this is how you easily trace the origins of both the Jewish religion
and the Christian religion -because I already told you the New
Testament is the Greek take on the Egyptian mysteries
-. When
Mel Gibson and those types tell you that there is a "true" Aramaic
language before the Greek New Testament, you must laugh, and
laugh hard; No-Such-Thing...!? This is their way of trying to "fix"
the uncomfortable fact that the New Testament... is Greek, and
its contents were laid out way before the Christ era; thus the
events, cannot be literal. That is what they are trying to "fix"...

When the Roman Empire (not the "Christians") burned the whole
Alexandria Complex of Learning, what they were actually doing
is quite clear; they were ERASING THE ORIGINS OF JEWISH
were erasing the Egyptian -and extant Atlantean Priesthood-
roots. No roots, no existence of the Atlantean Priesthod, see...?

A fact little known in general, is that Emperor Constantine who in
the 3rd. Century officially edited and inaugurated Christianity as
a way of extending the shelf-life of the collapsing Roman Empire,
in the trappings of the new Theocratic-Monarchy to follow, was in
fact a BRITON. Yes, he came from Britania (the british isles), was
considered an outsider, and indeed the way he came to be emperor
was regarded as a conspiracy plot. Concealing or not giving this the
due importance, has the instant effect of concealing from you the
fact that to the Egyptian and many syncretic sources that ultimately
were "fused" into "christianity", one must add the crucial cornerstone
inherently a Zodiac Archaeo-Astronomy glyph (thus we get 12 Signs
to correspond to the 12 Apostles). The druids of course, were some
of the most famous extant Atlantean Priesthood Wizards, and their
connection with northern Africa and Egypt, is fact; for ex. the celtic
music is almost identical to some algerian/moroccan music.

So what we have here, is the attempt by some secret elite, to

ONE PIECE AGAIN. They were since the greeks, attempting to piece-
back all the scattered sources after the Atlantean cataclysm(s). The

Cross was a crucial Zodiac mystery piece, and Constantine brought it
thus to Christianity, from the druidic british isles, its secret meaning
reserved for the tiny few. This is the "Temple" of Solomon, it is a
symbol of this agenda to piece back the remnants of Atlantis; it is

about a TEMPLATE of knowledge, cosmic knowledge that is; there
is no "Temple" of Solomon, the temple is the secret knowledge itself.
Whatever Temple there was, was of considerable less importance,
and only perhaps utilized as a mere reference bit -as so many other
real bits and pieces were included to bring a sense of "place & time"
and some veracity to the literal story-.

The Celtic Cross could be easily woven into the literal stories, via
the roman execution in a wooden pole or cross. This is why we find
IN THE 3RD CENTURY within "christianity"...! Actually there
was hardly any such christianity to begin with, but the evidence
in the Catacombs et al, is definitive, no cross...! You can easily
search for "Origins of the Cross" in the web, or simply read here:

However there is plenty of Celtic Crosses in the british isles, going
back no one knows how far. When Emperor Constantine concocted
his obvious fairy-tale lie of seeing a sign in the sky in the shape of
an "X" and a "P" (the famous "Chi-Rho" Sign of Early Christianity),
he was evidently trying to present "another" origin for the cosmic
esoteria of the Celtic Cross he brought along from Britania; he was
shrewdly trying to erase the connection to the Celtic Cross and the
Druids inventing new myths out of the blue, that's exactly what he
was doing. Which is naturally, standard Modus-Operandi by the
secret elite in the history of religions.

As I noted in previous posts, the "alpha" (beginning) & "omega"
(end) included inside the Chi-Rho "XP" Sign of Constantine, has
been deliberately utilized by MicroSoft in its "Windows XP" to
mean in secret, precisely this END theme -to announce it Urbi
Et Orbi, so to speak-; after all, what is more internationally used
and of more visual prominence, than Windows in this Information
Age...? And they have been some notorius cryptographers. But
you would not perceive or understand this, unless you knew the
"background" of Christianity and its encoded secret message.

I would personally treat with "extreme care" any inscription from
the Catacombs; from early on - since Josephus and on-, the Roman
Empire elite that was intending to create these new religions, were
but forgers of the worst kind; they went to no end to invent things
and create false proofs in the form of 'records' of any kind. Yet
for ex when we indeed find a truly veritable non-tampered source
such as the Dead-Sea Scrolls preserved unnoticed in a high cave,
all of a sudden all the "expected" records are NOT there at all;
the Essenes in those scrolls appear to be mostly of Egyptian and
Hebrew theologies, very absent any normal christian dogmas.
Worse, it seems quite likely, that these scrolls were preserved
by some disgruntled scribe, and that they truly were part of the
Syncretic Agenda of research ordered by the Caesar way before
Emperor Constantine (i.e. the "preparatory stages" of christianity
as Syncretism, ordered by the roman elite); these scriptural teams
would work isolated in the desert outside Judea. As through some
invasions these teams were forced to quit and scatter, someone
took the great care to leave us this tale-telling pieces, taking
advantage of the confusion of an invasion. This is why the Dead
Sea Scrolls were intentionally "delayed" by the Vatican, almost
for 40 years. They do tell a very different background for the
supposed "christian" Essene groups, rather totally egyptian...!
It was the Caesar who ordered the preservation and study and
compilation of the jewish-egyptian sects; because these would
serve as the Template for the new religion, Christianity. The
Dead Sea Scroll provides us with a glimpse of this process of
careful compilation; after centuries of work & analysis, finally
at the time of Constantine both the Jewish religion and the new
Christianity were "edited", with the full advantage of the early
work of these teams, from which they selected the texts to be
"official & approved". And thus the "Bible" all of a sudden as a
full body -as a full "book"-, appears into the scene by the 3rd

Therefore the question becomes: what did the Celtic Cross had
to say about OUR future, that it was so crucial it had to be included
in the new Template of Knowledge, being passed on secretly in the
guise of a public "literal Bible" new religion for the next 2 millennia?

This is what will be answered in Part 2 of this series.

Monday, September 14, 2009

"Hero-Tennis" vs. "Robot-Tennis"

Some totally misunderstood comments I posted in my FaceBook page
regarding the QuarterFinal US Open tennis match between chilean
Fernando Gonzalez & spanish Rafael Nadal. I also drew parallels to
spanish Barcelona mega soccer team, enlarging the subject to sports
in general ---{"... Fernando Gonzalez, at the US Open -Grand Slam
Tennis- you earned my full respect; no one wants machine-monsters,
we all like real human beings PLAYING a GAME. They've turned
sports into a War, and that's a crying shame...". "... Tennis & Soccer
have been cajoled into spectacles of "super tough" machine monsters.
Federer & Nadal "play" like Gladiators for their lives, and Barcelona
plays every ball like it's the Mayan's to-the-death old game. They
have lost their minds, man... Gonzalez was showing-off being
HUMAN, for a change...". "...As for Leo Messi, go back to your
Barcelona matrix team...!?..."}---.

For ex. a TV commentator in the following days SemiFinal between
Federer & Djokovic, complained that people who bicker about tennis
having been twisted into a "banger" frenzy, should remember same
was said about the late great Kramer -already in the '50's...!?-. But
that is not what I implied, at all; I will elaborate here, what I meant.

I might be a musician, a wanna-be philosopher, a former architect,
and decidedly a fringe wisdom seeker & esotericist, but that doesn't
mean I do not really comprehend sports, because I do have a keen
vision of both Tennis & Soccer -mainly because when I grew up
there was not much to do in my small town, 'cept watching the tv
tennis & soccer broadcasts-.

Before I opted for architecture, I did the same engineering campus
as Manuel Pellegrini -the current coach of Real Madrid-, although
he was like 6 years ahead of me, and besides being in a few parties
together, I never exchanged any soccer ideas with him (who at the
time was a central defender position soccer player of a prof. team,
at the same time he was studying engineering...!?). Maybe he saw
me sing a few times at university festivals & such, at best; that's it
for me & "Manolo" or "Pele", as he was called back then (currently
nicknamed "El Ingeniero", a term coined by the argentinian press).

As for Tennis, I never exchanged any inputs on the sport with any
luminaries, besides skying & partying together with the great Hans
Gildemeister for 2 weeks one winter in '85 or '86, when he was No.
12 in the world; Hans had just returned from Europe -having lost
to John McEnroe-, and when I was playing at the bar in the lovely
Portillo ski-resort, he sat really close to the 'stage' and later told me
I did some incredibly-accurate Neil Young, adding he had just seen
him in concert before returning. So we used to carry beers inside our
jackets as we ski'd the slopes of Portillo together & such innocent
mayhem as that, all 'very-proper' good old times partying on the
part of 2 german descendants.

Thing is, I took up the racket in '76 at 18 years of age (hardly the
early beginner), just for kicks; nevertheless, I had some fairly well
established -and quite surprising- avantgarde ideas about tennis,
which I was intent on "proving" in the court, as feasible. First of all
I considered tennis to be a POWER GAME, contrary to the then
prevailing view of the sport as a "Triple/Top-Spin & Slice" modus
operandi, bent on being tricky, laying crafty traps on the opponent,
mostly related to the soft treatment of the ball.

I used to call that "faggotty tennis" (my apologies to the gay crowd),
and I sensed this approach would robotize tennis, as way too much
emphasis was placed in DEFENSIVE TENNIS. The concept of "Wall"
player, who returns absolutely everything to perfection, was what I
despised the most -even the great Bjorn Borg was not my hero for
this very reason-. My hero of course, was Jimmy Connors.

I've never owned a racket, but I borrowed a Kramer for the 1st. time;
the malleable nature of the wood frame instantly bothered me. I then
looked around & borrowed a beaten up Wilson metallic racket, that
was much better in my opinion. Thus I went metallic from the get-go;
however the metal had its problems, and I started seeking graphite.
This an interesting story, because I instantly decided that the radius
of the ellipse of the old rackets was Way-Too-Small, and that tennis
rackets should be much much bigger, and was I right or was I right?

The reason for this, that "banger" tennis needs a much larger radius
of strings to hit the ball -I was constantly hitting the frame-; should
I add I started hitting the ball at maximum speed from the very start?
Nope, you already guessed that. Pretty soon I was practicing at
speeds almost professional level, even though I was just a beginner...!?

Naturally everyone thought I was plain crazy, they all told me I had
to really slow down many notches, but I kept thinking that my theory
of tennis was 'more right', now that I could confirm it on court. First
of all I considered the BODY POSTURE of a straight-ahead "banger",
a much more natural posture, it just seemed totally natural to try
to hit the ball at the maximum speed possible, preferaby focusing
on hitting flat, rather than top-spin. I instantly discovered that you
needed a 2-hand Backhand to play this tennis (i.e. like Connors), that
this was natural, not just a Connors-crazy thing.

Let me tell you, practicing this type of tennis in '76, was something
akin to being a loonie. HOWEVER I CLEARLY SAW THIS WAS THE
FUTURE OF TENNIS...! I developed the idea that all those spinners
in the soft mode, were already Has-Been's, that history would out-
play them. And that is exactly what happened, as time went by.

So it was sheer Synchronicity that I would meet Hans Gildemeister,
who was probably the "1st. major banger" of them all; the fact that
I could share another sports with him -skying-, was like confirming
my being right all along; I was not a pro-tennis player, but I felt this
was 'like' playing it -by triangulation, if you know what I mean-, in an
almost poetic statement to the matter. Now I was a musician, singing
professionally for the 1st. time in Portillo (for the whole seasons); and
Hans was there, what a great 'transference' of sorts (unfortunately I
was playing a cheap & crappy Epiphone 12-string, through an even
crappier old Peavey PA). When Gildemeister sometimes would beat
Bjorn Borg, this was to me like the ultimate proof of my theory; I just
kept thinking "This is gonna get harder & harder, faster & faster".
Like it indeed, did.

See, when you hit really hard & flat, you can actually PLAY INSANELY
WAY BEHIND THE BASE-LINE, from that far distance back you can
play aggressive tennis, and even phenomenal winning shots. Thus by
extending the "Range of Depth" to seemingly any distance, another
game was possible, you could catch balls almost at ground level even,
and play them back for win -not simply a sissy return-. Conversely
you could change your position drastically playing almost on top of
the base-line and hit the ball as hard-as-you-could RIGHT OFF THE
BOUNCE, very high in the air. This duality afforded you incredible
range and variety, always being on the aggressive side, playing "win",
not just sissy/defensive or "repetitive" tennis. Once I went to see
Guillermo Vilas practicing -standing right next to the side lines, very
up close to him-and I could so clearly see that all that spin craze just
led to to unnatural Body Postures and such; Vilas was so good at it,
because he had enormous muscles, Popeye doing tennis basically.

Quickly I also discovered that you could not efficiently do this if you
were a short guy like me, to excel you needed to be much taller; when
you added a killer serve -and why not, some nice volley capabilities-
in my opinion, this was "it", this was the future of tennis, period. And
that is exactly what happened, Serves became insanely strong as well,
as time went by. All this I thought of as the dramatic changes in
tennis playing, that would forever take the throne away from those
prevalent defensive players, and their myriad of Cat & Mouse crafty

However another generation of players would arise, combining both
the "Crafty-Tricky" old defensive game, with the new 'banger' mode.
This twin-mode of "Spinners & Bangers In-1", would takeover tennis,
and most notably Federer & later Nadal would epitomize such. They
seem to be aggressive, but in essence they are defensive players;
only adding the risky-bang in those crucial moments; for the most
part, their banging is really hard, yet of a "Repetitive-Defensive"
nature, and Federer for ex even goes to the 100% neutral defensive
Slice, most often than any player I've known.

This type of tennis revived the old stinky "Cat & Mouse" tactics, at
the same time proving to be of decidedly MACHINE LIKE behaviour
or ROBOTIC tennis; and it became the ultimate "Total Efficiency"
icon. It is based in exploiting the opponents weakness, capitalizing
mostly on their own mistakes, and by burying them under a wall
of repetitive banging. Federer was the most "Genius-Creative"
style of this lot, but still for the most part the emblem for the total
nightmare opponent. Like putting Bjorn Borg in the body of a total

However this to me is selling tennis short, in exchange for winning
a lot of tournaments; to me, for ex. the way Martin Del Potro has
begun to play, is much closer to what I had envisioned, because it
is straight-forward no bull/no tricks tennis, focused on YOUR own
playing, rather than the opponent's weaknesses. And most often
this weakness is of a PSYCHOLOGICAL NATURE, this the part
that sucketh most..!?

One begins to wonder: who's got the better Hypnotist...? That's the
one that will end up winning. Thus this sucks Big-Time Pig-Time,
period. This drone-repetitive, tricky-crafty, super-efficient machine
like tennis, more akin to a Vampire strategy than anything else.
Players with a blank hypnotic stare in their eyes, responding to the
most impossible balls, doing the super-human.

So there you had a hard-trying Fernando Gonzalez, playing the
US Open QuarterFinal in an open stadium in NY, under completely
insane wind conditions, and menacing rain at any minute, until
the rain stopped the game in the 2nd set Tie-Break, for days. The
whole scenario is ludicrous, and Nadal is playing like a robot, all
his balls seemingly non-affected by the strong win, practically
making zero errors, the ultimate machine. Days later after losing
the said Tie-Break, now 2 sets down and apparently under-slept,
Gonzalez decided to lose the 3rd. Set as fast as possible & go home,
enough of this crap. The set runs really short, and as soon as the
last ball's over, the rain begins to come back. What a mess...

So I complimented him for his attitude of BEING A HUMAN, and
let the robots win the games under these conditions. Of course
then Del Potro would completely obliterate a helpless Nadal,
who seemed to have been psychologically hurt by Gonzalez' such
quick capitulation, taking the "hero" stature out of his game. So
comes Del Potro, the young newcomer that EVERYONE wants to
crush Nadal to pieces; in his incredible crushing win it seems like
Fernando Gonzalez was inside his body taking a deserved revenge
on Nadal.

When he does so, Del Potro exposes the lack of variety in Nadal's
game, his Cat & Mouse tactics go out the window, and we see such
"Clear" tennis, with incredibly natural Body Postures and foot work
-as I always envisioned since before 1976-, not just about banging
but consistently and with great simplicity out-playing the disguised
defensive 'oh-so-efficient' playing of figures like Nadal.

Gonzalez disgust on the other hand, seems to have coalesced into
a concensus about the need to put a roof on the stadium, which is
a good (Duh...!?) thing, at last.

As to Federer's tight win -(...yawns...)- against Djokovic, he once
again shows some of his usual unlikable mystique; in the 5-5 Deuce
of the crucial 1st. Set, he ungentlemanly does not concede a ball he
had already lost, when the umpire had mistakenly ordered a repeat
of the play. Then he had 3 Lucky-Balls in the 1st. 2 Sets, the 3rd.
one actually being the 2nd. Set winning ball, a drop-fast after hitting
the net ball; not his fault, however while the whole stadium is loudly
going "Ooooh Nooooo...." the camera catches his wife quite merrily
cheering & clapping to this ball, well... not exactly nice these Federers.

Then it almost appeared like the Mafia had heavily bet on a Federer
win, because only in the 1st. 2 Sets Djokovic had to challenge a wrong
line call 6 TIMES, AND 5 TIMES HE WAS RIGHT...!!!! I mean, come
on guys, let's clean up the act, alright...?
And finally the Williams episode, which None-Dare-Call-It-Racist;
the victim the little old oriental line-caller lady. But it seems Racism
is a term applied strictly when it is White Racism. We whites are
Oh-So-Bad always, we are Oh-So-Racist... Never mind we are the 1st
developed nation to have elected a black president... So much racism
talk, and I don't see any black people emigrating to Africa ever, and
you know, there's plenty of excellent very high-paid jobs in Africa
right now. It seeeeeeeeeemmmmmsssss to me (as George Carlin used
to mock) that blacks are not getting it so bad in the US as they claim.
Now Serena Willims threatens the little oriental lady to 'shove the f*g
ball into her f*g throat', but that is not black racism, that is always
"something else". Oh no, thus was not racism, no no. Really...? What
I find most disturbing in the episode, is how Williams tries to pretend
she never threatened or said anything to the little oriental lady.

Ladies & Gentlemen, ALL RACES ARE RACIST, and the Jewish &
Blacks are amongst the most racist of all ! Ok...? This business of
blaming "only" the Whites, for politically-correct globalism, reeks
of high hell. Racism is a Human condition in general, not ostensibly
"just" a "white" thing, as the mainstream mantras seeks to make
us believe. It is just sad that the US Open had to witness proof of
such, now is it...? This would make for another post, but a more
careful well researched history of Slavery, shows that the black
slavery to the America's was managed in Venice -by the Venice
banksters nobility-, utilizing the Jewish networks over the globe
for logistics, and the seafarers transporting the black africans
almost never went inland, they just waited at the shore for their
black business partners in Africa to actually bring them the
captured slaves onto the ships !? Read more, study more, and ye
shall find that the real truth is a lot murkier than the simplified
charicatures we are sold as "history". Yes, not only the white
americans, but ostensibly the European nobility/aristocracy, the
Jewish (when you read "Venice Banksters", translate: "Jewish",
they were a better financial power than the monarchs !), and even
ostensibly the black power bloodlines of Africa, profited most.
But as I stated, this is just a US Open Grand Slam Tennis post,
only tangentially via Serena Williams, veering into this bad topic.
---Have a nice day!