"Miss Small Town Real America"s $150,000 wardrobe

The shameful saga of "Lois Lane Does Washington" (S. Louise Palin
of Wasilla - Alaska), keeps getting worse as time goes by. Only days
after her Off-Script Impromptu tirade against the majority of the US
population -where By Contrast & Contrive she labeled us "Not Real"
implying we're less courageous and less patriotic simply for not being
dwellers of tiny rural pocket hamlets-, we learned she barely skirted
Campaign Finance laws by spending $150,000 of contributors to the
the Republican Party's money, simply to buy chic clothes...!?

Yes, "Drill, baby, drill", apparently meant "Shop, baby, shop":
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gN2UuEbyF64GtuHQfJzWDqDg7PqgD93VQJE00
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gN2UuEbyF64GtuHQfJzWDqDg7PqgD93VP3RG0

We have the case of a veritable Narcissistic Delusional Goon, topping
all the Bull-Detector scales, trying to appear "presidential" and "hot"
to the repressed horny-toad conservative base, who for all practical
purposes drool at the imaginary prospect of "gettin' down 'n dirty"
with Miss Wasilla, she visibly enjoying her (it's-no-secret) half-porn
role, as if sheer ham could make up for blatant un-qualifications.

So what does you $150,000 buy...? - is the question-. Well, designer
clothes do enhance her boobs & derriere curve lines, and the $350
spectacles coupled with overdone hair & lipstick & makeup as heavy
as to deplete the whale population in no time, do give her that sexy
librarian tease look, there is litte doubt about that. As to the "other
details" of her... er... "performance" as Vice Presidential nominee, er
... that's another fantasy altogether. That's what Post-Modern make
believe Psycho-Sexual Politics can't possibly buy, and the proof
is in the pudding. As an example, her latest lunatic statements:

"" In an interview with Colorado TV station KUSA in response to a
3rd-grader's question, "What does the Vice President do?” she said:
"They’re in charge of the US Senate so if they want to they can really
get in there with the senators and make a lot of good policy changes
that will make life better for Brandon & his family and his classroom".
The comments have drawn criticism from Democrats and liberal blogs
which note the actual role of the vice president when it comes to the
Senate is simply to cast a tie-breaking vote in the event of a
stalemate. According to Article I of the U.S. Constitution, the vice
president is the "President" of the Senate, but has no executive
position when it comes to presiding over the chamber "".

Conservative Libertarian Catherine Austin Fitts (who served under
Bush I), published an incisive expose of Palin's abismal record:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd404.htm

It is an unmatched in hypocrisy Freudian-Slip, that while republicans
try so hard pass as "moralistic", meanwhile they are turning the very
presidential imagery into a Give-Me-A-Hard-On cheerleader circus.
It is not only vulgar but also demeaning to the female gender, adding
insult to injury.