Monday, February 8, 2010

Boredomphilia? Aghastaphilia? Or the true DaVinci code -part 2

Now reading part 1, somebody might be incorrectly led to think this
series is merely a justification for the not-really pedophiles that have
come to enlarge the numbers of the phenomenon recently. However
what I began to find out, is not something of clearly defined edges &
boundaries, but a sort of Pandora Box into the subconscious strata
of myth & history.

Let's recap before proceeding. We distinguished 3 types; the psycho
pedophile (bent on abuse & damage), the pervert (seeking newer
dishes on the sexual menu, endlessly), the disgruntled male reacting
to a current state of women that he subconsciously perceives as "not
well, semi-dead" (i.e. not best for the survival of the species through
reproduction) and as an automatic-default psychic mechanism going
for the healthiest/purest/youngest. That this is a long established
default shift mechanism in the psyche of males, is pretty clear; our
species not only defends itself from wild dangerous animals and a
hostile harsh environment; this is strictly the FEMININE FEAR,
operating always under the compulsion of looking for the fittest
& strongest father-protector of her offspring. Yet males fear the
woman won't be the spiritual nurturer of the offspring; these sort
of opposing fears ultimately determine the shape relationships
take. In the far past men simply went for the biggest womb
type of female -ample hips, round figure, succulent breast-, yet
nowadays more evolved males prefer THIN women, irrefutably
proving the shift in men's awareness -while women have largely
remained in the 'same place' in this respect-.

A typical female will subconsciously find most "attractive/desirable"
a male with a square jaw, wide shoulders and tall stature, long legs,
big arms & hands, hair developing "from" the front forehead instead
of "above/beyond" the forehead -this subconsciously perceived as
'gladiator type' vs. the 'philosopher's clear forehead-, penetrating
eyes (i.e. the "I can feel his eyes from across the room" syndrome),
a big wallet, a big car, a big house, big fame, all these things always
representing a BIG PENIS. It matters little if he indeed has the big
penis or not, as this is basically a for-peers public theater; thus all
these "big" posessions or proofs of "worthiness" in material/bodily
sense, send a signal to other females, of the Big-Penis iconography.
It means "I got the highest bidder", and "my offspring are better
protected than yours".


TEETH play a huge role in this subconscious assessment process;
teeth are the hardest (most materially condensed) parts of the body,
representing strength, as exemplified in the act of eating/tearing the
prey. Therefore Teeth are the "2nd. Penis' in the pecking order of
traits desired -they ultimately mean "Predator"-. Linguistically,
you see how "Penis/Predator/Punch/President/Pope/Palace" etc,
fractally repeat the "P" of "Pa/Poppa"; who's got more & better "P's
is the Biggest-Poppa...!? Awareness of this pycho-sexual replay of
the Law of the Jungle is what prompted priests to be called Father,
because they are simply enacting the same fractal gladiator power
unto the moral & spiritual arena. They all play daddy:

PRESI-DEN-T ~~~ PRIES-T

This is why there's an exaggerated obsession with Teeth amongst
celebrities, specially in people elected to office; Bush was perhaps
the 'quaintest' in the teeth dept, by and large you can pretty much
easily predict who will get elected just by looking at the size and
predominance of their teeth/smile. For ex in the latest political
figures, the Clintons, Bush Sr., Obama, Joe Biden, etc., all exhibit
abnormally prominent teeth & Smiles. It's all about teeth & ties in
politics -just like it's all about HATS in priesthoods of all religions
all the same (hat is synonym of condom in street slang)-. The Tie
represents the Penis almost literally, the Teeth represents the
predator quality, and this is how politics really works, folks...!

www.cosmomovieawards.com/actors/images/georgebush.jpg

We see a projection of the same "weak female in need of protection"
played out in entire nations when they take this damsel-in-distress
attitude
; W. Bush was basically just one big honcho show of "I'll
protect you my dear", a manufactured rancher image, the simple
mind folk (just like women like them), uncomplicated surface type
of talk, an engaging smile, a little humor always, coming from a
big state, a big family, a big power party, all in all a "sleep good,
big-daddy is watching after you". This hypnotic trance would not
have been fully effective without some traumatic event, so there
conveniently came 911; now you just had to rush to his arms in
panic. You may observe the classic Hair-Over-Top-And-Sides-Of-
Forehead trigger, the ultimate gladiator archetype (of course in
other academic circles this is derided as a "receding forehead", in
the sense of a devolution or not yet achieved evolution trait). You
find an exact match of this hair/forehead trait in his cousin Prince
Charles -and if you care to look, in most "power" figures-.

These female subconscious fixated compulsions, are nothing
but the manifestations of a deeply ingrained FEAR; fear of the
environment, of reality itself, of others, of herself, etc. These
are DESIRES TO BE DOMINATED & CONTROLLED, subjugated
to an "over-powering" male energy, that acts as "protector".
And as such, these Shopping-Lists attached to the mating and
the love process, profoundly distort & betray it, because in all
essence THESE HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH LOVE...!? Thus
the conundrum manifests as soon as an Evolved-Male suddenly
realizes this key problem, that underlies the entire "bonding"
of any relationship. This now more evolved male becomes aware
that "something's NOT RIGHT" with his female partner, in the
sense she is still applying fears and survival tactics pertaining
to foregone animal eras of the Law of the Jungle, to a present
civilized environment that is radically more benign. In other
words, the female has not yet adapted to the new environs as
they support life in the present age, persisting in replicating a
long-gone Genetic Memory totally out of context.

We observe that for ex the jewish female has already changed
a few of those "Physical" requirements that are of course in this
day & age completely irrelevant; the jewish chick noticeably so
has learned to often pick a male of her own size, not strong in
appearance, round headed, even a bald mate. She has detected
this type is more often that not RICHER in terms of wealth;
since wealth is today what muscle and running was in the cave
era, the shift is easily explained -she became smarter, now the
protector of her offspring is merely a supplier of money
-. Yet
although being smarter than most, she is not that smart neither,
as she still looks for... "protection" !

Women by and large need not be liberated from the male grip as
feminists claim, but from themselves! Of course we find similar
jungle-extant Psychic Programming scripts running in the mind's
background of males; this explains all the wars, aggression, control
freak obsessions, territoriality, and what have you. The difference
is that by now, these psychic programs are only running the lives
of some men, not the vast majority; for the most part, the vast
majority of men are so completely different nowadays from the
quintessential gladiator jungle type -in comparison most males
today are complete pussies, as the street slang would say
-. This
radical shift on males, altogether with the continuation of the
same archetype in females, is the root cause of the disfunction
between the genders today
. What has occurred is rather simple;
women in large numbers have "desperately" obsessed to choose
the ever-decreasing gladiator/jungle types, because this type
of male reinforces her own psychic programming. However this
type of male today IS RECESSIVE and Border-Line pathological;
thus at a staggering rate, these men have in one way or another
abused their female partners. So it follows women in scores now
shy away from males, adopting the new lesbian chic. The problem
remains unsolved though; a bipolar reaction is no solution, what
is needed on the part of females, is to abandon the programming
that is of no use today. Plenty of women are already effecting this
re-arrangement of priorities in likes/dislikes in respect to males
(typically shifting from the "power" type to the sensisive/creative
or wisdom-type), the problem is that they're doing this mostly just
after they are 40 or 50 or even 60 years old, if at all -way too late
in their lifespan (too little too late)-.

So we find a rising trend in women who begin to wake up and find
that their inherent "role-programming" IS DEFECTIVE. But this
trend is still overwhelmingly minoritary; men on the other hand
already started a massive shift away from the dominant gladiator
jungle type from the 1960's on! Therefore men have been on a path
of deprogramming for practically half a century now; most females
still will choose the recessive type over these men, and when for
one reason or another they do choose the new more evolved type,
their inherent programming compels to perpetually "nag them",
as they find these new men "not up to" their "expectations" (the
ancient extant gladiator jungle type that is). This ambivalence is
easily witnessed in the expression "I want a real man", so often
professed in the internet dating scene for ex.

A quick internet visit to any Dating Website demonstrates the gap;
the majority of women still "requires" a list of attributes that are
COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE; they will overwhelmingly require
the Old-Gladiator predator type, "combined" with the new softer
more wise and creative men. This happens because they are in
the process of awakening and surely they have detected by bad
experience that that former type is pathological in this era, but are
not yet ready to abandon the old programming, and simply "think"
that if they combine the old-man with the new evolved-man, then
Bingo!?, they got "Mr. Perfect". This is utter dementia, as both
types are by definition complete opposites, irreconcilably so.

I have taken an inordinate (and boring) amount of time to describe
this gap, mainly because while the male readers will instantly get
it, the female readers will not get it as quickly and need repetition
in this matter. Some females are evolving more rapidly than men
in some areas, but men have been evolving as a group en-masse
more rapidly; women by and large however refuse to apply their
newly evolved consciousness to the attraction/looking/choosing &
mating process. And this is what I came to discover was at the root
of the new supposed "rise in near or full pedophilia", as men have
begun to subconsciously perceive a grave disfunction on the part
of females in this respect, and by survival mechanism default to
the purest/still alive/still able youngsters. That there is a great
desperation in this, need not be mentioned; the dating scene is
dead, there is a cold-war amongst the genders, and men are just
passing time the best they can figure, now lured on the internet
and elsewhere, by the new super-young craze.

Perhaps what best illustrates the gap, is the fact that there are men
who indeed have the physical ideal gladiator jungle body, yet who
in their psyche belong to the new evolved type; and these men feel
"just as traumatized" as those who don't have this body.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
So enough of re-describing this phenomenon. Let's now take new
directions out of the same knot; I also began to read all those news
and articles and books one would normally not read.

www.scienceinafrica.co.za/2002/april/virgin.htm

This type of info. on the subject, is particularly disturbing. So let's
leave the shock aside and realize that when we speak of "Pedophilia",
we are referring to much more than the specific theme in itself as we
would normally consider it. Notice how the article page notes state
that these men are not clinical pedophiles at all...! In this case, we
are looking at a much different root cause than the one explained so
far here; we have a BELIEF SYSTEM as the origin of the problem.

In case you have been wondering where the "Or the true Da Vinci
code" title of this series fits in all this, now you have it; as a matter
of fact, the entire theme of the VIRGIN in all cultures/races/beliefs
all the same, is at the very heart of the issue; yet this theme has by
definition been applied only to the FEMALE.

The terrible factual info. of the above link regarding some beliefs in
Africa that propel men to rape literally babies, actually is not just an
isolated exception. The myths and beliefs associated with the female
Virgin go very far back in history -much, much farther back than
merely earthly human history, that is-. It is this underlying strata
that acts as the original resonator template for all the myriad of cults
and philosophies and practices all over the globe for millennia. You
find these ostensibly both in Pagan as well as Religious mythology.
In comparison to its pervasiveness, we find an exceedingly low No.
of studies and exposes on the subject; if you Google search for ex
under "The Origin of the Virgin Myth" -or the like-, you quickly
realize how scanty the information is. One of the 1st. websites that
shows up, is an atheist link -very poor in quality, but helpful-:

http://englishatheist.org/indexd.shtml

Thus contrary to the inherent claim of Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code
novel (or the original researchers Lincoln/Baigent/Leigh in the
late 70's & early 80's), it is not simply that the Catholic Church
has been obfuscating the Magdalene theme -the Magdalene as
the secret "real virgin/mother", allegedly (if one is naive enough
to actually believe any of it...)-, but that Humanity at large as a
whole has been obfuscating the true extent and depth and origin
of the entire Virgin/Mother "issue" -so to speak-...!

Whether it's the Holy Blood-Holy Grail or the Da Vinci Code or
what have you, makes little difference if at all; what we're dealing
with is the theme of the FEMALE GODDESS, that is split into 2
branches or aspects of the same Double-Axe Labrys: one is the
theme of the "MOTHER GODDESS", and the other is the theme
of the "VIRGIN GODDESS". It does not matter if these themes
and archetypes play a role in Christianity or elsewhere, or what
brand of Christianity -whether the Catholic, the Protestant, the
Priory of Sion, etc.-. Ishtar, Semiramis, Isis, Mary this-Mary that,
it's still exactly the same figure and theme, spanning millennia &
acting as the "Hidden Person" of all Trinities (Nimrod/Semiramis/
Tammuz, Horus/Isis/Set, etc).

After Akhenaten in Egypt's 18th Dynasty, these themes became
"occultic" or "esoteric" in his 3 follow-up monotheistic religions of
Islam/Judaism/Christianity (and their multiple variations), while
references to them became merely "iconic". Perhaps the aspect that
was concealed the most, was the subject of AGE; it is dead-obvious
that a young age provides automatic Virginity, and as such through
out history Vestal Virgins etc., were placed in Temples dedicated to
enacting these themes, from a very early age.

These child virgins served as "Sacred Prostitutes", practicing what
was then considered "a higher form of sex", without the attachment
& defilement of the usual materialistic subjugation to the protection
of the male -as found otherwise in the format of Husband & Wife-.
The Temples took care of these Sacred "Virgin" Prostitutes, and the
visitors-for-sex, left gifts of various kinds, respecting the lessons &
light they were receiving. In all truth, these were mostly spiritual
agendas dedicated to the renewal of the Kundalini energies, and/or
the elevation of the human DNA back to its former lost glory; which
is a good thing, but tainted with the engraving of sexual perversions,
as these practices logged into the collective unconscious, and became
an imprint for the male Genetic Memory. A similar double-edged
effect can be found in the buddhist Tantra practices, so easily found
to lead to abuse.

The reason it is so difficult to study the sexual Pedophilia practices
in ancient Greece of the philosopher's era, is because the underlying
themes I describe here pertaining to the Female-Goddess(es) and
the use of sex as a tantric way to health & ascension, involving the
child virgins, have been obscured and kept hidden. Without this
basis, one absolutely cannot understand at all why even Socrates
was a practitioner of such, being such a preeminent philosopher
(no, this was NOT the reason they gave him the hemlock poison,
as some idiots always tend to suggest
). The whole topic of "Young
Sex" in Greece, was related to these spiritual techniques, and
not a question of perversion -as for ex it would later clearly be
amongst the depraved Romans who invaded them-. And a great
man such as Socrates has been often maligned as being either a
supporter of tyrants, or as a pedophile in the modern sense, when
the truth is both the political systems then, as well as the sexual
customs of the day, were very different as to what they are now.

In India the theme expanded to the Hermaphrodites, which are
considered more in tune with the divine, and their prostitution
from a very young age is part of the same beliefs. In the days of
the Inca Empire in South America, the Emperor married his young
sister (and sisters), which is to mean that she was Virgin and only
reserved to him. When the conquistador Francisco Pizarro was
given one of the Emperor's wives, this has to be regarded as a very
high gift in that tradition, because even though not technically a
virgin, she was viewed as a "Special Virgin Wife" fit for the very
Emperor who was viewed as more divine than the rest of mortals.
Within the Islamics jihadists, when they kill by suicide-attack any
infidel enemies, they are promised 7 Virgins in paradise, who also
are of a superior kind amongst all virgins; every morning they will
wake up fully virgin again forever, is their belief. Queen Elizabeth I
was believed by many to be a "Virgin Queen" (even though Sir John
Dee was rumoured to be her lover).

Within the Catholic lore, the visions of Anne Catherine Emmerich
in the 18th century state that the Virgin Mary was 14 years old
when conceiving Jesus. In India to this day boys girls go through
Arranged-Marriages that take place as soon as they are sexually
fit -meaning often 10 or 12 or 14 years old, whatever-. The great
Mahatma Gandhi in India was "loaned" young girls by their families
to sleep with him during the night; this was considered a great honor
and blessing for the girl -if any sex took place or not was up to him-.

Therefore we have a present system of laws and what is regarded
as "correct" and so forth, contradicting practices & rituals viewed
as common and even holy -on respect to sex with younger girls-,
up until very recently (even the 1st. half of the 20th century). The
arabs & their harems were like americans & rock n' roll; Mormons
still -some- believe in Polygamy. And all these practices and socially
acceptable routines or even sacred rituals, can be traced in one form
or another to the pervading themes of the VIRGIN.

So not enlarging the sore issue of Pedophilia and its alleged "rise"
as of lately, to the overarching much bigger and defining themes that
provide the Genetic Memory &d the Cultural Habit through history,
is a disaster in the making.

It is no only Gandhi that was given young girls to sleep with as a way
of acquiring health in his old age, or the present day horrendous rape
of babies in Africa as a way to find a cure against AIDS, that offer a
much different conceptual background to the problem; for millennia
the theme of the "Pure" and the "Virginal" were directly associated
with Health & Well Being. The "AMBROSIA" or "SOMA" elixir of the
gods, was a mixture of hallucinogenics & the Menstrual Blood of the
Sacred Virgins of the Temples
; these potions were considered the
Elixir or Immortality...! We can trace the christian ritual of the blood
of christ in the chalice to be drank, to much older rituals along the
same lines, perpetuated for eons, in ALL RELIGIONS and traditions
all the same throughout the globe. But they all began as a Female
Virgin Goddess cult combined with the masculine themes (not as a
strictly either masculine or feminine worship).

In each case the Menstrual (Menses) Blood of the Virgins was seen
as a "cure", as a way of regaining YOUTH and connecting to the
higher potencies of paradise. Thus forever since then, the Virgins
and Youth constituted a conceptual unity, that extended unto the
realm of sex & marriage. Whether this alchemy veered more into
the vampiric blood consumption, or more into the sexual side of
the issue, is another topic -the fact is the fact as such-.

Many political and religious forces decided at some point to enact
a change from all this; our current society is a result of such. Yet
one thing is to "decide" and another quite different is for the actual
Human Psyche to "instantly" change; these people did not factor in
that there is a Genetic Memory at play, & that this RAM collective
program is strongly influenced by Archetypes -as Carl Jung began
to figure out in the beginning of the 20th. Century-.

Master engineers serving the elites on top of the human pyramid
decided to suppress the Female Goddess, merely preserving its
status as "icon" of no intrinsic science & ritual, while away from
the prying eye of the masses these same elites continued the old
rituals -but for themselves-. Therefore the Psychic Energy attached
to them never really died -it was merely transferred from the many
unto the very few in the elite-, & as such the masses still are indeed
influenced psychically by them...! Then in turn the same elites once
again decided to enact the more radical re-engineering of the female
role model in history, effected in just a few fast pair of decades...!,

which has caused a severe disfunction in the female-programming,
and we are to expect that no Pedophilia latent energies are going to
arise out of all this...? It is utterly preposterous.

Came the Victorian Era with its 2nd. Inquistion style of prohibition
of all things sex, then followed by a sexual liberation & feminism,
and these totally Bi-Polar pendulum swings have created a female
with masive "embedded shifts" in her psyche. First we were spoon-
fed a very submissive virgin-mother type (The Breeder), then we
were spoon-fed its opposite slutty-feminist type (The Amazon),
with an in-between trancision process all but one fast mass media
brainwash. And men are supposed to happily just take what these
puppet-master social engineers have ruined, and play along with
the tune. The truth is men are rebelling against these Gender
manipulations that have resulted in a de-facto Cold-War amongst
males/females, just as men are rebelling against the political order
itself, which is a clear Cold-War amongst the elite and the rest of
the population. They did not like what they saw in women after
all these social makeshifts were done with, and they certainly don't
like the political systems that come along with it. The anarchy that
results, involves apathy and a decreased libido that takes a hike
into the "younger set" -which has become to many a new form of
sexual protest-

.

No comments: