-Later added commentary-:
In India alone, 15 MILLION little children (real children, not phony
legalese labeled "children" as grownup teenagers -there is a reason
they are called different things, duh-) are involved in CHILD SLAVE
TRADE. From the former Behind The Iron Curtain eastern Europe,
tens of thousands each year join the mass of children of other origins
who typically end up as Europe's dirty little secret. It is a contention
of this post, that by pooling together both real children and teenagers
(grownup sexually able & often fully sexually active) as one and the
same "victim" category, this enables the perfect creation of a truly
abusive elite pedophile market niche, muddying/confusing/corraling
the issue, by inducing the rise of sexually PENT-UP males under a
long-term outdated social experiment; a mass of males behaving in
Repressed Genetic Memory manner -as the PERFECT COVER for
the truly sick pedophile networks to hide, an ideal smoke-screen-.
Personally I never associated the use of the computer to sex or to
sexual curiosity; to me, the video VCR represented that, while the
web & pc was for me a way to knowledge. Different Folks-Different
Strokes, I guess.
I always read how viewing porn via the computer was increasing to
astronomic proportions. That didn't spark my attention; then I kept
on hearing about the "Preteen Craze" in the Web, scores of men of
all ages avidly demanding to see "Preteen No Nude Modeling" as it
is technically labeled (of course but the front entry to the industry,
all the way from No Nude to Softcore to Hardcore).
Since the general tendency in the media news was to link Pedophilia
to this new phenomenon -more by innuendo really, I never saw a
single case of a clear explanation of this- , and repeatedly you were
treated to the latest arrest of a child-porn int'l ring, I began to think
about this; so I decided to take... a peek.
First thing I ostensibly noticed, was the deceptive nature of what
is classified as "TEEN" or "PRETEEN" on the part of the modeling
web providers. Quite obviously so, whenever you read "Teen" it
actually meant Over-20 years old; which instantly explained why
so many men switched to "Preteen"... i.e... just to finally get to the
Teens they were initially looking for...!?
This led me to from the Get-Go ponder on the 'Entrapment' nature
of the whole deal; it seemed to me, this Incorrect Age Labeling was
ultimately rendering a vast segment of people not even remotely
connected to Pedophilia, as "potential pedophiles". Now does it?
Thus it started funky, and funkier it got as I went along. Then of
course came the inter-mingling of "Teens" & "Preteens" in nearly
all No-Nude ("NN") modeling picture portfolios. In other words, if
any naive excited softcore male wanted to delight himself looking at
Teens in Bikinis that were not already wasted old hookers with more
sexual mileage than a 50-year old -passing as "Teens"-, the only
way of achieving such, led to modeling websites who mixed both
"Teens" & "Preteens". You catch my drift...?
Then I observed something that any model photographer knows
by the book -I assume-, that on one hand women look a lot OLDER
in pictures when a lot of skin is exposed, just as on the other hand if
you stumbled upon a "true Preteen" photo, it was really hard to tell
the age. This due to two main reasons: 1, that usually their faces
almost always wore expressions a few years ahead of their real age,
and 2, that no matter how SMALL their girlie bodies were, you had
no way of assessing that, for lack of comparison. In other words, you
can photograph a tiny little girl alone, and lacking any reference to
a comparative size -(for example, ideally your own presence)-, they
always look a lot BIGGER and often look the size of a grown woman.
This "lack of scale" in photography, was quite noticeable.
To complicate matters even more, the more clothes the models
shed, the "bigger" and "more mature" they LOOK ON SCREEN.
Which led me to ponder; if any guy say was fantasizing about for
instance a former girlfriend he had -or could not have !- in high
school, and this fantasy girl happened to be truly petite, he would
be in real trouble to actually get the "feel of petite" in the pc screen,
quite a feat actually. This means that he would have to almost
desperately surf "down" in the Age of the models, until he would be
able to get to pictures that actually feel like "petite young chicks".
This photo distortion of size & age -coupled with the constant lying
about the true age on part of the modeling websites- led me to think
that it is practically impossible NOT TO almost by default veer into
"true child modeling websites". I mean, the whole system is exactly
built & designed with that precise intention...! Once you are in the
Web looking for female pictures, the road to "Younger" leads only
one way, directly to "Really Young" then directly into "Child Young".
Is this by accident...? No, it is more like an Expressway !
Unless of course you are a complete moron that can never surf to
what he wants, or you are terminally addicted to trashy funky old
whores...! Most of the Teens that actually were of age, still had faces
and expressions eerily reminiscent of hookers. In fact, it doesn't take
long at all, to realize that both to get the "feel of young & petite" as
well as to get the "impression of innocence" when looking at photos
on the Web, is as hard as to find a virgin in a rock 'n roll club. Mind
you, those are qualities applicable to any desirable woman, not to
a "child", on a man's eye.
Therefore any normal male would end up looking at pictures ON THE
INTERNET of females much younger than he would even fathom in
REAL LIFE. This, unavoidably so.
As soon as you hit this milestone -and it happens fairly early on-,
you get to the conclusion these are quite murky waters: "Internet"
most often has very little to do with "Real Life", in this subject.
Being the Critical-Thinker I hope I strive to be, I decided to take a
breath and consider the Bigger Picture. I remembered I once read
that a really famous historical figure which I won't name married a
13 year old. I also remembered reading that the reknown christian
visionary Anne Catherine Emmerick revealed that the Virgin Mary
was 14 years-old when she conceived Jesus (I am not validating the
Gospels as fact, or Emmerick as accurate, I am merely pinpointing
to a respected source, in relation to a "story" of maximum world
wide importance as role-model, be it fiction or not all the same).
Hell, as a boy it was still common in rural areas to marry young teens,
nobody saw that as neither weird, much less "pedophiliac". In India
and many other places in the globe, that is still today a normal thing
to do . So I asked the inevitable: how come in the 20th century's
2nd. half for the 1st. time in all history, authorities came to "label"
in legal terms that a "marriable" woman was either over 21, or over
18...? How did this quite dramatic SHIFT in age-criteria happen...?
Lately they've been dropping these limits, in the US every state has
a different rule, the expression "Consensual Sex" as related to any
charges of "Statutory Rape", is as muddy as the Brazos River, as it
appears nowadays Legal Manuals are needed before a man proceeds
to become excited -along with the proper condom-.
I don''t intend this article to be an apology for the "Younger Women
Are Better" mantra, much less to support Pedophile philosophies.
I am simply framing the subject of "Pedophilia on the Internet" with
some historical & psychological guidelines.
See, if for at least 6 Thousand years (yes, 6000), Men have been
used to desire young girls as soon as they were "Sexually Functional"
(usually considered such as soon as Menstruation started), isn't it
true that SEXUAL MEMORIES are part of a vast & strong Collective
Unconscious of the species...? That these are Trans-Generational
pools of Extant Genetic Memory...? That if we accept the reality of
Reincarnation, these Sexual Memories would be from Former Lives
of the same individual, as well as the Genetic Collective pool...?
Who/Where/When and for exactly What reason, all of a sudden and
irrelevant of all this history of millennia, decided to abruptly raise
the Age of "Acceptability" for Women engaging in relationships of
either Sex or Love (or both) with Men...? One thing is to set laws
in a piece of paper, another is to actually alter the genetic makeup
of your 6000 year-old Memory (just to accept this reduced figure,
which we now know goes considerably farther back in time).
Why was there such a push to "Equalize" the ages of Men & Women
in a relationship...? Was there perhaps a deeper evolutionary reason
why Humanity has always acted on this through the pattern of Older
Man mates/marries Younger Woman...? Maybe an important clue
that those who legislated on this matter overlooked?
Then I went on to try to remember my youth days; how often did
I ever hear of Pedophilia...? Did I ever get to know of an actual case?
How come it is so prevalent and massive in scale now, as compared
to it being almost non-existent then...?
-You Guessed It...!- Yeap, I started to think the same; perhaps then,
there is a direct link between raising the age of "Acceptable Female
Partner" and the advent of a noticeable Increase in Pedophilia !
Thus in classic George Carlin way the Conspiracy Cynic in me went
"Ah !?". Voila, maybe -just maybe-, someone somewhere had "other"
agendas regarding this issue. Like... which, you may ask?
I don't know your IQ, but mine is over 150. Possibilities come quickly
to you under a mind of this IQ; my IQ tells me -scrape that, shouts
in my ear !-, that for example if someone was interested in Reducing
the Population... this would have been an excellent way. Just take all
females at their healthiest & most unblemished bodily age -towards
which the Genetic Programming in the males reacts most to desire
to love & procreate-, and decree that they are NOT ALLOWED to do
such. Propose a never tried new formula model of Men-Marrying-
Women of the Same Age, as the "ideal". Stick Men & Women all the
same in a classroom for 12 long years -until they are 18-, then stick
them in university for say 4 to 7 more years -until they are 22 to
25-, then turn the job market into a stressful rat-race with prevalent
repeated recessions & waves of lay-offs, and yes you WILL indeed
have succeeded in reducing the human breeding process...!
Most couples would then marry/procreate usually well into their
late 20's if not in their 30's. As a matter of fact, a larger number
than before, would end up NOT marrying/procreating at all.
It is neither the object of this article to discuss the perils of Over
Population, or to demonize a Population Reduction agenda. I am
just observing the all-too-obvious; Men will Consciously be taught
to see as desirable only women much older than genetically he was
bred to, but that cannot imply by any means that Subconsciously
he will cease to do so. Mr. Freud discovered a little thing called
"REPRESSION"... of... MEMORIES. Your Conscious Mind tells
you to Forget Something really important, yet underneath it all
through the years... your Subconscious Mind still remembers it
vividly, and that repressed memory will continue to surface in
a myriad of ways, you simply cannot make it "disappear".
I am not "suggesting"; I am clearly STATING that perhaps a not
so benign hidden agenda was imposed, to tamper with/manipulate
a very delicate & important aspect of Men's sexuality, in order to
perhaps induce a massive Generational REPRESSION. And this
would explain the later "Burst" of "Pedophilia"; call it "Creating
the Niche Demand". Call it Messing Up With People; call it what
you want, the fact of the matter is that a change in deeply inbred
genetic traits was legislated & effected on paper, and you cannot
sit and expect no consequences. The whole matter, the more you
start seriously paying attention to it, is peculiarly ABNORMAL.
I read the other day a genetic study that concluded Evolution was
a result of Older Men mating with much Younger women; it seems
the kind of Positive-Mutations that make Evolution possible, only
occurs in this scenario over long periods of time. This would seem to
validate the love/sexual patterns of Men picking younger Females,
it lends a credible Survival of the Species raison d'etre for it.
A lot of serious questions begin to creep-into this research; like,
who/when/where/why determined women could not vote? Or
that you had to be 21 to vote, or that you have to be 21 to drink,
or that drugs are illegal (while alcohol & tobacco are not). Who made
We all know by now how phony the so-called "War on Drugs" is; it
does succeed in creating a vast demand for it, for sure. And it raises
astronomically the price of drugs, creates violent criminal cartels,
incarcerates thousands of people at a high cost, who by all means
don't seem to be a danger to society, exposing them to the prison
population of real criminal history.
We have seen how all totalitarian regimes induce a strong sexual
repression only to be followed after their demise by a pendulum
reaction in that respect ("El Destape" as it's called in Latin America
& Spain). We have the right to genuinely ask; if a strong repression
of millennia-old patterns of love/mating was imposed on the Male
population regarding women's "Acceptable" ages -a pattern that
seems to be essential to Evolution-, is it not logical to expect a
foreseeable pendulum reaction to it, after by law Men's sexual
trans-generational memory pools were repressed...?
I totally trust my gut-instinct, that suggests to me that while there
may be a few true Pedophile sickos amongst the men who go to the
Internet as a Let-Go Valve for this REPRESSION EXPERIMENT
PERFORMED ON THE MALE GENDER, in general the vast
majority are harmless 'fantasizers', or victims of the websites
shrewd herding methods & tactics -as described before-.
The inherent question on "Harm & Damage" is all too pertinent.
Pedophilia cannot be continued to be defined based on arbitrary
historical laws imposed who knows for what hidden reasons. The
main bottom-line theme, is about ABUSE; abuse comes after serious
objective irrefutable Damage perpetrated against the free-will and
consent of the victim, with usually deliberate intent (although in the
case of Pedophilia even by 1st. time or impulse/accident cannot
rule out the damage, yet most cases would fall in the "deliberate"
It seems to me, just like there is a phony War on Drugs designed to
confuse & obfuscate, distract & protect the truly serious criminals,
using the little-offenders who pose no threat to no one as public
patsies & sacrificial scapegoats to hide the real villains from sight,
by analogy there is a concerted effort to wage a similarly phony
"War on Pedophilia", bent on arresting the small-offender (mainly
those in possession of pictures), and make a whole-lot out of a whole
lotta nothing so to speak, seemingly to maintain well preserved the
utter invisibility of the big Pedophiles, who everyone knows sit in very
respectable high places -even in religious pulpits-, quite high in the
social & power structure, who benefit of a highly organized network
of criminal Pedophilia clearly bent on Abuse and inflicting Harm as
a perk. Seldom one does see one of those getting caught, if at all.
Moreover, if the vast Social Experiment performed on the Male
population at large, indeed created a Repressed Memory Syndrome,
then it follows that there would be a great vulnerability to this
peculiar trait amongst present-day males; this suggests that maybe
the hidden agenda was to create a power elite who could be thus
"rewarded special privileges" to enjoy sex with very young women,
as the BIGGEST PERK OF ALL.
Under that scenario, these male figures would be forever the subject
of high-level Black Mail from the top/down, in such a way that any
reform of the present system would be a disaster for those running
the whole show. In other words, by legislating what is essentially a
blatant Prohibition on men to engage in their normal love/sex habits
of millennia of evolution and historical pattern, thereby imposing
artificial age-limits of "acceptable" female partners, we might have
witnessed and/or experienced an In-Your-Face artificial creation of
a strong demand for Pedophilia -no different than the Prohibition on
Alcohol before, and on Drugs presently amply demonstrate. However
valid the "moral & scientific reasons" might have been for this -(as a
front, that is, the cynic in me suggests)-, they were applied with no
regard to the Genetic Sexual Memory of the male human species.
It seems to me that those who profit from this state of things, ideal
comnditions for a massice systemic BlackMail for-life of male power
figures, would be the most interested maintaining the status-quo and
refuse to even discuss or rationally analyze the issue.
Whereas meantime the epidemic of the real & true Pedophilia, that
one involving actual children -before they are sexually functional-,
of the kind sickly bent on inflicting definite harm & abuse, seems to
keep going unimpeded, fully under the radar of mainstream society.
As a related offshoot of such, there exists the Mind Control aparatus
operating through ritual child abuse to create Multiple Personality
Dirsorder as a standard method.
This subject is peculiarly hard to research and emotionally charged;
the more I look into it and surf the web scouting the reality, the more
I get the impression the whole affair reeks of long-term conspiracy.
There is considerably more than meets the eye here, and males under
a repressive social engineering experimental scam of massive scope,
are both perpetrators/victims along with the underage victims.
It is wise to admit that this is but part of a larger social engineering
agenda, involving the role of Women & the Family, but that exceeds
the scope of this article. Many researchers have expounded in such,
and their research is easily found and makes indispensable reading.
There's quite a bit of "associated topics" to the issue, as for example
if watching an Action movie makes you a Murderer. Many have
argued unsuccesfully that violence on tv & films leads to violence
in real life; however the data is scanty. Similarly watching porn
does not seem to lead to uncontrolled sex; besides true children
in overt sexual images, does the exposure to images of young teens
in softcore pose lead to Pedophilia...? If watching an action film
does not make you a murderer, why watching a teenager in softcore
modeling would make a man a "potential pedophile"...? Or by law,
in fact a Pedophile...? Why are both treated with different criteria?
It is evident that in an action film the actor portraying the victim is
not harmed; yet... is a young model in a safe studio... harmed...?
The experience of Russia and the slavic countries tends to suggest
that "Preteen" modeling actually is a source of safe income for many
a destitute teenager; perhaps this way they are spared the harsher
fate of being forced into prostitution.
Many have noticed how the news media seldom if ever mentions
the age of the females abused, that's one BIG red flag going up.
Often the news refer to "in possession of thousands of pictures";
yet, a person can download thousands of pics in just a few minutes,
everybody knows that modeling websites offer files for sale that
contain many shots of similar poses, most of the pics are "fill-ins",
therefore their files for sale are most in the hundreds of pics, any
person buying their pictures would evidently have "thousands of
pictures" in no time, it would actually be impossible not to, from
the moment anybody decides to buy even just a few. Elemental
gaps and inconsistencies like this, seem to run rampant in any
reporting on the subject. We all of course trust that the people
prosecuting these crimes use common-sense and target the true
criminals and pedophiles... but.. how can we be sure this is the case
if such vague and slanted information is provided as a rule...?
I have become convinced, this is a subject that needs discussion.
The more it goes under the rug, the more both the Black Mail
nature of present day power & politics & religion continues to
exist, along with the truly abusive high-level Pedophile rings.
Most often the subject is treated with what could be best-termed
"Superstitious Cliches", which only helps to degrade the serious
discussion of the issue. While the phantom-theme of Mind Control
reverberates all the more as a lid of silence is kept on the issue.
25% of 12 year-old students in the US are engaging in full-blown
sex with an average of 4 partners. There are child-prostitutes
in all major cities, serving the well-to-do; of any taxi-driver can
find them and take the client to the locations, how come the law
appears not to be able to...?. Young girls are showing behaviour
& clothing styles overtly sexual, yet the society as a whole, keeps
pretending publicly this is the 1950's or the like, and the utterly
obsolete laws are a laugh in the face of facts.
Modern up-to-date Legislation is needed, but this will only come
after open realistic discussion. Any critical analysis like the one
I am posting here, is a small milestone in an ocean of disregard.
The proper questions are needed to be asked; all the associated
angles -and there are many to this topic- need to be exposed
and dealt with as a mature society is supposed to do.
For a fact, the advent of the Information Age -the internet through
home pc's and now through cellphones- facilitates the access of child
porn or its aproximates, to anyone and increasingly what used to be
accesible only via payment now through the the "free previews" is
accesible easily to anyone, and it is the children who are doing the
most viewing -web filters and all-! It is blatantly obvious to the
reason, that Porn Is Here To Stay and becomes bigger, particularly
Preteen & Child Porn. Under such scenario, the logical route would
be to rather accept it and educate youngsters, to "open up" the old
repressed mode based on Prohibition as a deterrent, so the Allure-
Factor is disposed of automatically, and quickly boredom settles in.
It is quite logical to conclude that the current "repressive mode"
that sustains the respective legislation, is 'out' and impracticable.
The current expansion & increase in Preteen & Child porn, is a
worldwide phenomenon as a byproduct of the solely based on
Age-Limit models of legal consensual sex. Nothing will change
reagarding this issue, unless the flawed model of another era is
changed; criminalizing consensual sex assuming all females of a
same age group are identically sexually-functional, is decidedly
an oxymoron that is at the root of the problem.
If there was one word that could me mustered to sum it all up, it is
a giant sign with the word HYPOCRISY ! writen in neon letters. The
current "laws" are not dealing with issue at all, they are merely there
to give a sense of "We're taking care of this" to the usual Hypocrites
and their inflated sense of Self-Righteousness, the usual suspects.